Tag: Hypocrisy

July 15, 2011

I Now Understand the Left’s Hypocrisy Because It’s Not Hypocrisy – It’s Blind Loyalty

I used to get blue in the face every time I would see some hypocrisy on the left and try to point it out to them. It was like talking to a brick wall. Think Joy Behar. Yeah, that kind of brick wall. That harpie still goes on and on about how many vacations Bush took during his presidency. Does this fool not watch anything else other than her own HLN show and The View? Then I ran across a piece in Mother Jones a while back, written by some Obamabot named Kevin Drum. After reading his piece “Obama, Libya, and Me,” I had a V-8 moment. “AAAaaahhh! I get it now!” It’s not hypocrisy to these tools – it’s BLIND LOYALTY!

Blindfolded

Check out this passage from Mr. Drum’s piece about his thoughts on Obama’s decision to bomb Libya:

So what should I think about this? If it had been my call, I wouldn’t have gone into Libya. But the reason I voted for Obama in 2008 is because I trust his judgment. And not in any merely abstract way, either: I mean that if he and I were in a room and disagreed about some issue on which I had any doubt at all, I’d literally trust his judgment over my own. I think he’s smarter than me, better informed, better able to understand the consequences of his actions, and more farsighted. I voted for him because I trust his judgment, and I still do.

For now, anyway. But I wouldn’t have intervened in Libya and he did. I sure hope his judgment really does turn out to have been better than mine.

Wait, what? You “hope” his judgment turns out to be better than yours? Are you kidding me? Where was that “hope” that Bush was right about Iraq? Oh, wait… I have to keep reminding myself – it’s only hypocrisy if someone on the right does it.

Mr. Drum, the Wizard will see you now. It seems he’s heard you’re searching for a brain.

May 17, 2011

Examining the List of Obamacare Waivers

Now, I know I’m late to the game on this, but the recent news about more waivers being granted for Obamacare caused me to dive into it again and have a second and third look. First I was wondering about the connections some of the companies had with democrats or democrat-supporting organizations or people, but then you don’t have to research to find that out for a lot of them; it’s right there in their names: this “Union,” that “Brotherhood,” this “Guild,” etc., etc., etc.

Corner of Hope & Change


I started noticing not who the waivers were granted to, but at the number of employees some of them listed. Aren’t these waivers granted so that the companies/organizations won’t bear an undue burden financially? If you have ZERO or 3 employees, why in the world would you need the waiver?

The HHS has broken the waivers down to separate lists. On the list for “Self-Insured Employers,” it describes the waivers thusly:

“Self-Insured Employers: Approved Applications for Waiver of the Annual Limits Requirements. This is a list of self-insured employers that have received waivers of the annual dollar limit requirements for group health plans offered to their employees.”

So let’s just take a look at a few of these shall we?

Some place called “Maverick County” has 1 enrollee. “Captain Elliot’s Party Boats” has 10 enrollees. “Big Valley Labor PRM Health Plan” has 4 enrollees. “Pacific Risk Management” has 3 enrollees. The “Town of Frisco” has 8 enrollees. It goes on and on.

The next list is for “Health Reimbursement Arrangements,” which is described as this:

“Health Reimbursement Arrangements: Approved Applications for Waiver of the Annual Limits Requirements. Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs) are employer-funded group health plans where employees are reimbursed tax-free for qualified medical expenses up to a fixed dollar amount per year, and unused amounts may be rolled over to be used in subsequent years.”

Let’s take a peek at a few of these.

Something called “FIDUCIA” has 2 enrollees. “Alizio & Galfunt” has 4 enrollees. “Cargo Ventures” has 2 enrollees. “Hypex, Inc.” has ONE enrollee. (Really? ONE enrollee? Wow.) And “United Transportation Union GCA 225” has 2 enrollees. *sigh*

Now we get to the interesting stuff. From the list for “State-Mandated Policies,” the waiver list is described as such:

“State-Mandated Policies: Approved Applications for Waiver of the Annual Limits Requirements. In some States, issuers are required to offer standardized policies with specific annual dollar limits established by State law. These State-mandated annual limits are below the minimum annual limit set by HHS. In such instances, States may apply for a waiver of the annual dollar limit requirements on behalf of issuers of State-mandated policies if State law required the policies to be offered by the issuers prior to September 23, 2010. Although the State may apply on the issuers’ behalf, the application must still satisfy the standard that compliance of the annual dollar limit requirements by the issuers would result in a “significant decrease in access to benefits” or a “significant increase in premiums.””

The following entities have ZERO enrollees listed:

  • Companion Life Insurance Co.
  • John Alden Life Ins. Co.
  • Mid West National Life Ins. Co. of TN
  • National Found Life Ins. Co.
  • Reserve National Ins. Co.
  • Standard Life & Accident Ins. Co.

There are others with only 1 or 2 enrollees, so what is it that I’m not getting? If you have ZERO enrollees, how are you going to suffer a “significant increase in premiums?”

This whole things just STINKS to high heaven to me. I just pray that Republicans (true conservative Republicans) regain control of the Senate, and we get a SOLID conservative in the White House in 2012. We have to repeal this monstrosity before it does any more damage than it already has done. I have a very dear friend who works at a V.A. Clinic, and the horror stories she tells me about how they “take care of” pateints there is unbelievable. Yet if we do not repeal Obamacare, I’m afraid that’s the kind of “care” we’ll all be forced to have.

Shame on us, America, for having let things get this far. We have been very bad stewards of our own liberty.

October 25, 2010

Joy Behar Wants 10% From Juan Williams, and Wants Us to Know NPR Has Been Thoroughly Vetted by Media Matters (VIDEO)

From a partial transcript, h/t Mediaite (I don’t know who did this transcript, but I tried to fix it as much as possible for spelling and punctuation errors.):

Barbara Walters: It’s why I sometimes have trouble here and don’t give my opinion because I’m also with ABC news. If you are a commentator and you’re giving opinions, you’re in one category.

Sherri Sheppard: Is that a pundit?

Walters: You can call it a pundit. If you are giving the news straight, you’re not supposed to give your opinions. Now, that’s changed so much. We’re in a whole other time now. Everybody has an opinion. If you don’t make more noise or scream louder or so on, you don’t get the ratings. So it is a funny blurred line. They said he’s a journalist, he’s a correspondent, and he’s not supposed to give opinions. But when he goes on another cable show like Fox and does it — so it’s a very blurry line. In the meantime, we hope he’ll come on with us and, if nothing else, give Joy and Whoopi 10%.


Sherri Sheppard: Bring your checkbook with you.

Joy Behar: I don’t need the money. But the thing of it is that NPR has been vetted by objective Media Matter type people and they have found that –

Elizabeth Hasselbeck: Media Matters?

Behar: I don’t know if it’s Media Matters. Maybe someone could find this out for me. They have found NPR is very balanced, unlike Fox, which is not balanced. Fox has now become the arm of the Republican Party.

Hasselbeck: That’s such a talking point, joy. It’s not true.

Behar: It is true.

Hasselbeck: It is not true.

Behar: People who are running for office are commentators on Fox.

Walters: Fox says their news is fair but they are a very conservative cable [station] with a particular point of view. I would like to ask our friend Bill O’Reilly, who is still with (sic) the subject every night on his program, I think we should get 10% of his salary.

You’re welcome, Joy. Chris “tingles” Matthews clip courtesy of me, you hypocrite buffoon.

October 24, 2010

Karl Rove Schools Bob Schieffer on Outside & Special Interest Funding (VIDEO)

This was classic Rove, and classic Schieffer, insofar as Bob picking and choosing what parts of a study and/or facts to include in a Q&A session. I don’t agree with everything Karl Rove does or says, but in this case, he’s spot on. And what does Bob do? Three times he says “let’s go back to my original question.” Excuse me, Bob, but some pretty formiddable and uncontrovertible facts were just thrown in your face, and you act like you didn’t hear them?


MY GOD, this man is pathetic. Face the Nation is an out-dated program with an out-dated anchor, and both should be put out to pasture to live out somewhat normal lives as they nurse their apparent Alzheimer’s.

Way to go Karl!

October 21, 2010

FNC Investigates Other NPR “Journalists” and Their History of Bigotry & Hypocrisy (VIDEO)

This is just evidence beyond belief. Bravo for the crack FNC staff getting the background on funding, current staff and other employees of NPR saying WORSE things than did Juan. If Juan Williams must be fired for expressing his “opinion” on TV, then certainly we can ask the same of Ms. Nina Totenberg and her other brethren at the liberal, hypocritical NPR.


Now…I’m waiting for the Dems to join the Repubs in denouncing NPR for this blatant hypocrisy. Wait, what’s that I hear???

~…..crickets……~

And a hat tip to Roger Ailes, for upping Juan’s contract, and extending his role at Fox News Channel. HOORAY for Juan, but more importantly, hooray for FREE SPEECH!

© 2012 MsUnderestimated All rights reserved - Wallow theme v0.46.5 by ([][]) TwoBeers - Powered by WordPress - Have fun!