make custom gifts at Zazzle
April 12, 2012
September 6, 2011
No words are necessary to describe this. Just watch and be repulsed. Yes, O is repetitive, but apparently so must his detractors like myself be, in order to get the message across that the Democrats and their supporters are a bunch of hypocritical fools who do NOT practice what they preach. After I saw Hoffa’s despicable performance yesterday, I had to assemble this montage for you. Watch and fume, watch-and-fumers!
What a load of horse squeeze from the lot of them! Especially from the Union Thugs at today’s Labor Day rally in Detroit, Michigan. And not only did Obama let Hoffa get away with his “take ‘em out” comment, he LAUDED him during his part of the speech, thanking him for his support. What a tool.
July 15, 2011
January 9, 2011
It’s amazing what I’m finding on the web tonight, seeing the libs and progressives jumping to conclusions about the motives of Jared Loughner, when nobody can really know what was in his mind. We do know, however, from other details, that he’s most probably not a tea party afficionado or devotee. Nevertheless, teh oh-so-tolerant lefites have some warm affection and love to send to the Tea Party conservatives.
I’ll begin with my favorite of all tonight:
“The Tucson Tea Party will be made to pay for the blood on their hands. An eye for an eye. You want a civil war, you got one. KILL Jesse Kelly for his role, then KILL Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Gleen Beck. Whoever puts BULLETS in ther HEADS shall be a NATIONAL HERO.”
That’s just from one commenter in a story in The Hill today. Here’s a screenshot of the entire comment – I’m hoping that someone will share this with the appropriate law enforcement personnel.
Here are some more gems I’ve found, with corresponding annotation:
January 7, 2011
Today, as the first session of the 112th Congress started, they began by a reading of the U.S. Constitution. Well, at least parts of it. They left out portions of it because apparently they felt some might find those sections offensive, so it wasn’t done for brevity. What section might you think they left out due to sensitivity? Why, it’s the “3/5th’s Clause” part, silly!
This clause falls into the same category as the following items:
On their face, these all sound nice and reasonable, but they’re all misnomers. If not misnomers, they’re at least deceptively named to the average uneducated American (which, by some accounts, is a large percentage of folks everywhere).