OP Chaos Early Indicators in Indiana? (VIDEO)
Yes, it’s early, but there are indications that Rush’s Operation Chaos is in full-swing in Indiana.

Watch the video here, as Megyn Kelly reveals the early results from Indiana.
Yes, it’s early, but there are indications that Rush’s Operation Chaos is in full-swing in Indiana.

Watch the video here, as Megyn Kelly reveals the early results from Indiana.
Last week Neal Boortz had author Jerry Zeifman on his radio show to interview him about an article recently published by author Dan Calabrese, based on Zeifman’s book “Without Honor: Crimes of Camelot and Impeachment of President Nixon.” Dan Calabrese collaborated with Zeifman on this article about Hillary’s firing by Zeifman (life-long Democrat) during the Watergate hearings. From the article:
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
Why?
“Because she was a liar,†Zeifman said in an interview last week.
“She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.â€
How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation.
Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.
It was an amazing interview, and I cannot believe (well, yes I can) that more media outlets have not picked up on this story. Unbelievable doesn’t begin to describe it. Yet believable it is.
Another small tome of Mr. Zeifman is “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” and it’s well worth the read. Please get your copies quick – they’re going fast, and not too many are available anymore.
You can watch/listen to the interview in three segments here, here and here.
Again, from my favorite political editorial cartoonist, Michael Ramirez of Investor’s Business Daily, comes this gem.

Gotta love it!
Folks, this is a very disturbing article, and for many other reasons that just the obvious. Why do McCain pundits and supporters wonder why the conservative movement is so reticent to blindly thrust their support behind McCain? For me it’s always been one of those gnawing things that I just couldn’t put my finger on, besides the obvious immigration, Bush tax cuts, etc., issues. Then I get a tip from a friend about a recent article he’s found at WorldNetDaily. From the article:
The CIA is a left-wing, liberal outfit, and its main job for some time now is not attacking America’s enemies but conservatives in general and George W. Bush in particular. The story is best told by friend Ken Timmerman in his new book “Shadow Warriors.”
When the time is right, the Clintons will see to the leaking of the GRU archives on McCain to the media. Bet on it, just as you can bet they’ll follow it up with media disclosures of the lady lobbyists in Washington having adulterous affairs with McCain. (There are at least three of them; I know the name of one, but I’m not going to put it in writing.)
Maybe McCain will try to fight back by confirming Hillary’s well-known bisexuality and her lesbian affair with her beautiful assistant, Huma Abedin. Google “Hillary” and “Huma Abedin,” and you’ll get almost 6,000 hits. Turns out Huma is a Muslim who grew up in Saudi Arabia and is strongly suspected of working for Saudi intelligence.
Or maybe he’ll capitulate to Clinton blackmail. You never can tell what a psychologically unstable guy will do.
And that last point is why ? be prepared for this, folks ? I would not in any circumstances vote for John McCain, not if either Hillary or Obama were the alternative. Evil is safer than crazy. Leftie amateur inexperience is safer than crazy. So I agree with Ann Coulter who says:
“I’d rather deal with President Hillary than with President McCain. With Hillary, we’ll get the same ruinous liberal policies with none of the responsibility.”
How in the world can the Republican Party get saddled with a nutcase wack job who knows nothing about economics, is so anti-capitalist he uses “profit” as a term of derision, has never run a business or had any job outside of government, will raise taxes, is so stupid that he believes “stopping global warming” is worth destroying the American economy, won’t drill ANWR, won’t appoint strict constructionist justices, won’t protect marriage, will give amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens, is beloved by the New York Times and lives in a delusionary world of vanity and rage?
Rush is right. A McCain presidency will be the destruction of the Republican Party. It needs to be rebuilt, not wiped out with the field clear for the fascists of the left to consolidate power and eliminate freedom.
And maybe the only way to rebuild it is in dedicated impassioned opposition to a Clinton White House. That should be the subject of Ann Coulter’s next book. I’ve already got the title for her. Her last book was “If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans.”
Very disturbing indeed. The question is, what is a true conservative to do this election season? Regardless of whether McCain or a Democrat wins in ‘08, we’re all going to be losers. There’s not even a win/lose situation – it’s a lose/lose all around. God help us all.
Last night on Real Time, Maher came out of the gate swinging at Hillary and her campaign tears. Noel Sheppard from Newsbusters also covered this, and has a partial transcript here:
These are challenging times for the politically correct, I mean, don’t blame me for being sexist, because I read this in the New York Times that Hillary Clinton was going to lose New Hampshire, and then she cried and people voted for her especially the women. They wanted to see the robot cry. That’s what it was. It was like P.T. Barnum, “See the robot cry.” She broke the fourth wall. She cried, and then there was blood on the Son.
But I’ve heard of electing a president you want to have a beer with. But, electing a president you want to have a good cry with? I mean, it’s not a serious country. And I noticed that it was the exact right amount of crying. Did you see that? I mean, it wasn’t like a full tear, people would have been like, “Oh, come on, that’s glycerin! That’s bullshit!” It was just, it was like, if it was any more crying, it would have been like Howard Dean’s scream.
Most of you must also realize that all the tinpot dictators in the world saw Hillary’s tears, too. Don’t you understand that a president like this is what they desire most?
Watch the video here.
You gotta be kiddin’ me, right? Well, according to the Politico, the Hildabeast is saying just that:
“You can always tell when the Republicans are getting restless, because the Vice President’s motorcade pulls into the Capitol, and Darth Vader emerges,” Clinton said just now at Town Hall in New York, referring to Cheney’s efforts shore up Republican congressional support for the Iraq war.
“I’m not invited to their meetings and I don’t know what he says or does,” she said. “But all the brave talk [about ending the war] just dissipates.”
I’m stunned – just stunned. Hey, Shrillary…you’re not invited to their “meetings?” I’d rather be associated with a ‘Darth Vader’ than the tinfoil hat-wearing moonbats, madam, since you refuse to repudiate the MoveOn.org ad about Gen. Petraeus. Just keep doing what you’re doing, Senator…you’ll soon remember your past cannot escape you in your bid for the presidency. You are not exempt from the left nor the right, and you deserve the respect of neither.
And remember most of all that your husband spoke so negatively about the “politics of personal destruction.” Is that a policy you want to welcome, or one you want to shun? So far, it’s sounding like a full-on embrace. Enjoy the relationship, as it appears to be one you’re reveling in.
Oh, wait… was that a stone coming toward your glass house window? Oops!