Category: Conspiracy?

July 15, 2011

Understanding Obama in 2011 Through the Eyes of a 60s Radical

If you’re like me, and you’ve been somewhat perplexed by some of the things the Obama Administration has been doing, you need look no further than a blog posting from 2008 by one of the founders of the Weather Underground; Mark Rudd.

Mark Rudd

Back in ’08, it appears Rudd was trying to assure his fellow radicals and progressives that what Obama was going to do would have reason, and in the end, they would all be able to understand it in retrospect. Believe me. Nothing this president has done has been without reason, either by action or inaction. His choices, after reading Rudd’s piece, are all very clear to me now.

To begin with, Rudd explains how Obama got elected in the first place, and why he positioned himself the way he did in his piece titled “Let’s Get Smart About Obama:”

Obama is a very strategic thinker. He knew precisely what it would take to get elected and didn’t blow it. He used community organizing methods to mobilize a base consisting of many people who had never voted before or who regularly don’t vote.

But he also knew that what he said had to basically play to the center to not be run over by the press, the Republicans, scare centrist and cross-over voters away. He made it.

I’ve often wondered what the Obama governing doctrine was, and it appears at times he’s wandering aimlessly without purpose. Au contraire – it is completely intentional.

…he has a narrow mandate for change, without any direction specified. What he’s doing now is moving on the most popular issues — the environment, health care, and the economy. He’ll be progressive on the environment because that has broad popular support; health care will be extended to children, then made universal, but the medical, pharmaceutical, and insurance corporations will stay in place, perhaps yielding some power; the economic agenda will stress stimulation from the bottom sometimes and handouts to the top at other times.

Sound familiar? Remember, Rudd wrote this piece back in ’08 just after Obama’s election. It was like Rudd had a window into the future; perhaps a “playbook” he knew well and understood Obama also knew well. Coincidence? I think not.

What about his decisions to keep some of the original players in place?

On foreign policy and the wars and the use of the military there will be no change at all. That’s what keeping Gates at the Pentagon and Clinton at State and not prosecuting the torturers is saying.

Rudd then goes on to explain the small, incremental steps Obama must take to get to the point where he will have everything in place to release the progressive hounds across the land, to set in motion a completely new “fundamentally transformed” America.

Move on the stuff you can to a small but significant extent, gain support and confidence. Leave the military alone because they’re way too powerful. For now, until enough momentum is raised. By the second or third year of this recession, when stimulus is needed at the bottom, people may begin to discuss cutting the military budget if security is being increased through diplomacy and application of nascent international law.

If memory serves me correctly, aren’t they currently all discussing exactly how much we’ll have to cut from the military budget? The only problem with this thought process is things aren’t going the way Rudd planned – there is no increased diplomacy or security. The rest of the world hates us now more than ever before, and Obama’s rating in the Muslim world is now lower than W’s was. Let’s hope this unfortunate state we’re in stops the “application of nascent international law.” But as we’ve all noticed lately, Obama seems to bow before the U.N. more often than he comes to Congress on issues of foreign policy.

And what about all the nonsense the news is reporting on? Seems like we have constant news breaking on Friday nights, all the small issues seem to be the big “news” stories, but nobody’s really talking about the real things that are going on. Sheer luck or bad timing? Nope… part of the plan.

…you have to be able to look like you’re doing one thing but do another. That’s why all these conservative appointments are important: the strategy is feint to the right, move left. Any other strategy invites sure defeat. It would be stupid to do otherwise in this environment.

Look to the second level appointments. There’s a whole govt. in waiting that Podesta has at the Center for American Progress. They’re mostly progressives, I’m told (except in military and foreign policy).

Don’t you all remember the elites on both the left AND right saying “Glenn Beck is crazy,” he’s just a “conspiracy theorist” with all of his shows about the people the president surrounds himself with? Crazy? Really? It is and was part of the plan. It’s like Glenn previously said: it’s like they’re trying to break down the entire makeup of our society, all the while building a gigantic structure to just hang in place until all the internal pieces of the progressive puzzle have been assembled, and then a switch will be flipped on, giving life to the exoskeleton that exists and the rest will fall in place. Seriously, I want you to stop reading this for just a moment, think about all the things Rudd said in his piece, what’s really happening in this country right now, and ask yourself – was Glenn right? He always said he hoped he was wrong, and I did, too, but it appears he was too close to the progressive sweet spot. Perhaps that’s why he left Fox to pursue this beast with his own machine.

Rudd puts the final call out to top off Beck’s predictions and observations about what’s happening:

Our job now is to organize both inside and outside the Demo (sic) party. There’s already a big battle in the Demo party at every level. Here in the New Mexico State Legislature, the progressives are challenging the conservative Dems for leadership; the same is true in Congress. If you can’t stand to work in the party, work on putting mass pressure on issues such as healthcare and jobs and the war from outside.

ACORN, SEIU, AFL-CIO anyone?

We should all say a prayer of thanks to Glenn for awakening a previously sleeping citizenry. And let’s hope he has much more success with Mercury Radio Arts in combating this cancer that is the progressive movement, as it has metastasized throughout this country. It must be defeated by whatever means. Rudd’s call to action must be met by equal and opposite action by the Tea Party and other grassroots movements. We cannot rest for one moment. The progressives surely won’t.

August 17, 2010

‘Son of Hamas’ Speaks Out Against Imam Rauf’s Ground Zero Mosque (VIDEO)

Not only does this converted Christian, Mosab Hassan Yousef, call for the Ground Zero Mosque to be stopped and reveal the true meaning behind it, he calls for all moderate Muslims to condemn Imam Rauf and the building by the Cordoba House of this “Islamic cultural center.” He also hopes that Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf cannot find the $100M funding to build this center. Yousef should know what he’s talking about; he’s really the son of one of the founders of Hamas, and wrote a book called “Son of Hamas” where he recounts “his agonizing separation from family and homeland, the dangerous decision to make his newfound faith public, and his belief that the Christian mandate to “love your enemies” is the only way to peace in the Middle East.”


Mosab also says that this, like other mosques built in conquered lands, is just a place of division and that it will not only hurt Americans, but it will be harmful to Muslims around the world. And it unnecessarily causes wounds at the burial ground where nearly 3,000 Americans were killed by Islamic jihadists on September 11, 2001.

You should check out Yousef’s blog here. He has some stories to tell, and they are worth hearing.

September 8, 2009

Beck on Van Jones Bringing Down…Van Jones (VIDEO)

Glenn Beck today reflected on Van Jones’ resignation over this past weekened, saying he didn’t deserve credit for it, although he received just that all weekend long via Twitter, email and voice mail. Glenn wonders, as do I, why the ONLY thing folks seemingly find a problem with is his participation as a 9/11 “truther.”

A truther? That’s it? That’s all folks are concerned about? There is MUCH more disturbing information about Jones that should be MORE troubling to ALL Americans! Examples include his past self-avowed proclamation as a Communist, his work as a revolutionary for S.T.O.R.M., his respect and admiration of Che & other dictators, his link to the groups who want to free cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal (also a self-avowed Communist), his links with the California “CopWatch” group, his assertion that “white polluters” were intentionally poisoning people of color, his desires to use the Green movement to get “social justice” for people of color, his disdain for the people of Isreal, his past as a black nationalist, and on and on and on. I could go for much longer, but I think you get my point.

The most troubling aspect of this whole thing to me is this: Even though Van Jones resigned, the White House never said they disagreed with Jones’ politics; only that they were sad to see him go.

Folks, I ask you to watch this video a few times and ask yourself a few questions:

  • Can you support a president who does not disavow the beliefs of a man like Van Jones?
  • How many other of the “czars” are there in the Obama Administration that we need to know about?
  • If the White House doesn’t vet people like Van Jones, even with the cabinet-level position questionnaire others hand to answer, how can you trust any of their other unaccountable appointments?
  • Are you willing to blindly trust anything that this administration, and/or the Democrat-controlled Congress tries to thrust upon this nation?

If you answered “no” or “I’m not sure” to ANY of these questions folks, we are in trouble. As you saw today, as Van Jones is on the way out, Ron Bloom is the newest czar of Manufacturing. How much longer will you allow this to continue? And don’t give me this crap about “what can I do?” You can do your due diligence as AMERICANS, stand up and tell this government you will NOT TAKE THIS ANYMORE!

Obama and Congress…DON’T TREAD ON ME!!!!

I’ll see you guys next Saturday in D.C. I’ll be there for the march, and I hope to see you there, as well. It’s time to make our voices heard. We are the silent majority NO MORE!

September 3, 2009

The Continued Unraveling of Green Jobs Czar, Van Jones (VIDEOS)

Tonight on Beck’s show, he revealed more unearthed and uncovered video and audio of the exploits, beliefs and agenda of Obama’s Green Jobs Czar, Van Jones. This is just incredible, and how the White House can allow this to happen is unbelievable.

Seriously, how can this be allowed to continue? Is the FBI this inept, or did Obama waive Jones through? Either way, the FBI better come out and distance themselves from the administration on this garbage. Especially considering that they are the point-men on “high-value detainee interrogations” now. That is some SCARY shi* if this is how they vet Executive Branch personnel!!

Michelle Malkin weighs in with her intel, and provides more background into Van Jones’ Oakland history.

You tell me, people. Do you want a President who surrounds himself with radical people like this?

September 1, 2009

Beck on How the White House is Using the NEA (& Your Tax $) for Propaganda (VIDEO)

Today, Glenn had artist Pat Courrielche on to discuss the recent NEA conference call with the White House, calling on all artists to use their media to promote all of Obama’s agenda items. Pat recorded the phone conference because he felt uncomfortable with what they were asking. I’m just going to let you watch the segment, and will display below Pat’s write-up about this whole affair below from this article:

“What does it mean when a government official evades the truth?

On August 25th, I published an article discussing a conference call hosted by the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), the White House Office of Public Engagement, and United We Serve that invited a group of art community luminaries “to help lay a new foundation for growth, focusing on core areas of the recovery agenda – health care, energy and environment, safety and security, education, community renewal.”

In the article I argued that it was not the role of the National Endowment for the Arts to use the arts to address specific issues, especially those of “health care” and “energy and environment” that are being vehemently debated nationally. I also clearly indicated that I was invited by the NEA and questioned their involvement in a meeting of this nature.

Two days later an article was published in the Washington Times that referenced my account of the conference call. Kerry Picket reported in the article that she “asked the NEA for a copy of the invitation to the conference call, but Communications Director for the NEA Yosi Sergant told us that they were not the ones who sent out the invitations for the conference call.” Picket continues, “Mr. Sergant directed us to the Corporation for National and Community Service as the body that sent out the invitations.”

Well, someone is playing loose with the facts. And let me say clearly here and now, it is not I. As can be clearly seen here, the invitation not only came from the National Endowment for the Arts, but from Sergant himself.”

This should truly frighten all of us. I URGE you all to go read Pat’s article here and check out his own invitation to the call, and what artwork has been produced as a result of this co-mingling of interests. Folks, the WHITE HOUSE itself was IN on the conference call! And Sargent says to be patient while they learn how to legally post government site on Facebook, and how to communicate on Twitter legally? Are they kidding us? What is happening????

© 2012 MsUnderestimated All rights reserved - Wallow theme v0.46.5 by ([][]) TwoBeers - Powered by WordPress - Have fun!