Category: Appeasement

May 22, 2011

How Obama REALLY Threw Israel Under the Bus

Everyone is saying that Barack Obama threw Israel under the bus, but they are citing the part of his disastrous Mideast Foreign Policy speech where he says Israel must go back to the pre-1967 borders in order to have peace with Palestine. I contend, however, that it’s the part where he tells Israel she’s on her own! Here’s the portion of the speech I’m referring to, courtesy The Root: (emphasis mine)

“As for security, every state has the right to self-defense, and Israel must be able to defend itself — by itself — against any threat. Provisions must also be robust enough to prevent a resurgence of terrorism to stop the infiltration of weapons and to provide effective border security. The full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be coordinated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility in a sovereign, nonmilitarized state. The duration of this transition period must be agreed, and the effectiveness of security arrangements must be demonstrated.”

Did you read that? “…by itself?” Israel must be strong enough to DEFEND itself BY ITSELF! In other words, ‘hey, Israel, if you have to defend yourself aganist Iran, Syria, Egypt, or whomever else, you will NOT be getting any help from us!’ That’s exactly what he said, and it’s exactly what he meant. What? We can help the Libyans and Syrians, but we won’t help Israel? Are you kidding me?

Every Republican should remember this one stance when we are fighting amongst ourselves over who’s the better GOP nominee to go against Obama. Like Rush has said, I’ll vote for a vending machine before I vote for Obama. So, please people… FOCUS ON WHAT’S IMPORTANT! We MUST take back the White House, if for no other reason than we have to put someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue who will reaffirm our friendship and alliance with Israel.

January 13, 2011

Rhetoric By Any Other Name is…Free Speech

In this insane political environment in which we find ourselves after the horrible tragedy in Tucson last Saturday, we have renewed calls from various officials, pundits, journalists, and even lawmakers floating ludicrous proposals to ‘tone down the rhetoric,’ ‘tamp down the vitriol,’ and change the political climate; all by creating new laws and regulations regarding speech, certain words in general, and, yes, even symbols.

So I’ve taken the time to give them some example of this “vitriolic rhetoric” and how they’re used in our everyday conversations, so the new Speech Police will be able to more easily recognize these inflammatory terms and phrases when they’re encountered.

Yes, this list is ridiculously long, but the wailing and gnashing of teeth, sweating of brow, and fretting over such terms and phrases is just as ridiculous; not necessarily in length but in breadth of insanity.

So, here we go. These are the things that we may no longer be able to say, and phrases we may no longer be able to use (in print or orally) once the Speech Police have gotten their way.

We can no longer shoot the breeze, take a stab at trying something new, tell someone their perfume is killing you, poison the well of the moment, or tear into a bag of chips.

We cannot call people hostage takers, shoot from the hip, address a target audience, shoot down ideas, fire off a nasty email, eviscerate the competition, do battle with an opponent, or war-game a business plan. You cannot tell an actor to break a leg, we can’t combat an illness, assault someone’s character, grapple with the facts, verbally joust with a co-worker, make a show of force with your team, whip someone into shape (or a frenzy), go for someone’s jugular, say someone mutilated the English language, and whatever you do, don’t tell anyone you successfully executed a plan.

November 9, 2010

Obama’s Epic Fail Trying to Answer Indian Student’s Question About Jihad (VIDEO)

Man, oh, man. This man is really starting to scare the crap out of me with this appeasement horse squeeze.


And on top of that, he never even answered the girl’s question. Believe me, Indians know EXACTLY what Jihad is, as its definition has been written in the streets…in blood…for decades. If anyone knows what Jihad is, it’s certainly the Indians. Unfortunately, our Commander in Chief can’t bring himself to admit it himself.

Religion of Peace my ASS!

October 23, 2010

Zuhdi Jasser to Juan Williams: “Thank You For Waking Up America” (VIDEO)

On Friday’s O’Reilly Factor, Juan was sitting in for Bill, and one of his guests was Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy. Dr. Jasser is to CAIR like Thomas Sowell is to Al Sharpton and his National Action Network. In other words, Dr. Jasser knows how destructive and discredited CAIR is, and how bad they are for the legitimate discussions and debate that NEED to be had in America about the roots of Muslim theo-political ideology.


The story of NPR’s firing of Juan is well known, as is Megyn Kelly’s take-down of CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper. CAIR and Ibrahim Hooper are just the same kind of race-pimps that we see in Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, NAACP and the like. The more they can keep their people down and dependent, the more they stand to profit. Dr. Jasser and men like Thomas Sowell are so far past the victimhood that is so pervasive in groups like the NAACP and CAIR. It’s refreshing to hear this discourse.

Only good things can come of this now-open dialogue. We cannot assuage our fears of Muslims in traditional garb on airplanes until Muslims themselves begin to admit it’s a Muslim problem and it has to be addressed in their community – fighting the extremists and destroying the Islamic theo-political ideology.

October 6, 2010

Should America Fear Islam? HELL YEAH! (VIDEOS)

Last Sunday on “This Week with Christianne Amanpour,” the title of the show was called “Should the West Fear Islam?” Now, she could have just stopped it at that and spared the audience from a one-hour show of America-bashing Islamopologies. The obvious answer to the show’s questions is a simple “yes,” but there was one nugget in the show that really explained the truth.

Panelists on the show included Rev. Franklin Graham, evangelical leader; Robert Spencer, founder of Jihad Watch and co-founder of Stop the Islamization of America; Ground Zero Mosque co-founder Daisy Khan; Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and other scholars and families of 9/11 victims. Rev. Graham and Spencer were both outspoken about the evils of Islam, as was former Muslim, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, reporting via satellite, probably for her safety’s sake. You see, the wonderful, peace-loving, serene religion of Islam has issued many Fatwas against her, for which she has 24-hour security protection. Remember the Dutch filmmaker, Theo van Gogh? When he was killed by an Islamofascist, a knife was plunged into his chest, pinning to it a note to Ali saying she was next. Van Gogh produced a movie Ali starred in called “Submission” about the oppression of women under Islamic Sharia law.

One particularly enlightening exchange came from co-founder of an organization called Islam4UK, Anjem Choudary, who was speaking via satellite from London. It was Choudary who provided the clarity that answered the question en toto. Here are the three segments from the show interspersed in this partial transcript:

AMANPOUR: Let me just say stop you there for a second, because this side is obviously the side that says one shouldn’t fear and that there are moderates and the whole religion should not be painted with the same brush. I want to, though, now go to Anjem Choudary in London. You have said that you think there should be Islamic domination. Why shouldn’t people be afraid of that?


© 2012 MsUnderestimated All rights reserved - Wallow theme v0.46.5 by ([][]) TwoBeers - Powered by WordPress - Have fun!