November 30, 2009

Brit Hume’s Special Commentary on Climategate (VIDEO)

This is one to cherish. His response is the same as mine regarding the dunces who say that the climategate emails were “taken out of context” and the White House, who still claims it’s settled science.

Brit Hume is one brilliant dude. And he’s in good company on this subject.

  • deekaman

    The response of the (alleged) AGW acolytes has always been, “we just don't understand what the data is telling us.” Never, “We could be wrong about this Climate Change stuff”. So why should their response to Climate-gate be any different. This is a religion, not a science. We are talking an increase in CO2 of 80 parts per million, from 300-380 ppm. Now that would seem like a lot until one recognizes that 80 parts per million is 0.00008 (I think I got the zeros right) parts per hundred or 0.00008% of the total atmosphere. (Again,make sure my math is right here).

    (Alleged) AGW doesn't pass the smell test.

  • deekaman

    The response of the (alleged) AGW acolytes has always been, “we just don't understand what the data is telling us.” Never, “We could be wrong about this Climate Change stuff”. So why should their response to Climate-gate be any different. This is a religion, not a science. We are talking an increase in CO2 of 80 parts per million, from 300-380 ppm. Now that would seem like a lot until one recognizes that 80 parts per million is 0.00008 (I think I got the zeros right) parts per hundred or 0.00008% of the total atmosphere. (Again,make sure my math is right here).

    (Alleged) AGW doesn't pass the smell test.

© 2012 MsUnderestimated All rights reserved - Wallow theme v0.46.5 by ([][]) TwoBeers - Powered by WordPress - Have fun!