In this video, Robert Gibbs wins the argument. Yes, the same Robert Gibbs who steamrollered over a question about the “Fairness Doctrine”. Where is the presumption of innocence here? How dare Santelli call people “losers”. What does he mean by 8% versus 92%?
If anyone has committed fraud, let the law deal with that. Otherwise, let's respect the fact that this is an economic nightmare that the law failed to protect us from. The chaos is so widespread that even if anyone does manage to sell their house to cover their bills, they risk being evicted from rented accommodation when their landlord gets repossessed.
Kevin
In this video, Robert Gibbs wins the argument. Yes, the same Robert Gibbs who steamrollered over a question about the “Fairness Doctrine”. Where is the presumption of innocence here? How dare Santelli call people “losers”. What does he mean by 8% versus 92%?
If anyone has committed fraud, let the law deal with that. Otherwise, let's respect the fact that this is an economic nightmare that the law failed to protect us from. The chaos is so widespread that even if anyone does manage to sell their house to cover their bills, they risk being evicted from rented accommodation when their landlord gets repossessed.
Kevin
In this video, Robert Gibbs wins the argument. Yes, the same Robert Gibbs who steamrollered over a question about the “Fairness Doctrine”. Where is the presumption of innocence here? How dare Santelli call people “losers”. What does he mean by 8% versus 92%?
If anyone has committed fraud, let the law deal with that. Otherwise, let's respect the fact that this is an economic nightmare that the law failed to protect us from. The chaos is so widespread that even if anyone does manage to sell their house to cover their bills, they risk being evicted from rented accommodation when their landlord gets repossessed.
Welcome
