<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The View on The White House Christmas Card (VIDEO)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/12/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/12/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/</link>
	<description>Reality Bytes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LTCPMax</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/12/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/comment-page-1/#comment-105284</link>
		<dc:creator>LTCPMax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/12/22/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/#comment-105284</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t you mean the Secular INTOLERANT left... ?   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t you mean the Secular INTOLERANT left&#8230; ?   <img src='http://www.msunderestimated.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LTCPMax</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/12/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/comment-page-1/#comment-115668</link>
		<dc:creator>LTCPMax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/12/22/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/#comment-115668</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t you mean the Secular INTOLERANT left... ?   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#39;t you mean the Secular INTOLERANT left&#8230; ?   <img src='http://www.msunderestimated.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sluggo_F16</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/12/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/comment-page-1/#comment-104775</link>
		<dc:creator>Sluggo_F16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 04:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/12/22/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/#comment-104775</guid>
		<description>Walters is just another example of the &quot;secular&quot; &quot;tolerant&quot; left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walters is just another example of the &#8220;secular&#8221; &#8220;tolerant&#8221; left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sluggo_F16</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/12/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/comment-page-1/#comment-115669</link>
		<dc:creator>Sluggo_F16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/12/22/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/#comment-115669</guid>
		<description>Walters is just another example of the &quot;secular&quot; &quot;tolerant&quot; left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walters is just another example of the &#8220;secular&#8221; &#8220;tolerant&#8221; left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LTCPMax</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/12/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/comment-page-1/#comment-104707</link>
		<dc:creator>LTCPMax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 19:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/12/22/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/#comment-104707</guid>
		<description>what complete and utter rubbish.  She should be feeling honored to be on the White House/Presidential card list. Why do I have the feeling that NO MATTER WHAT Mr.&amp; Mrs. Bush did with the card for BABA she would have taken it as a chance to snipe and ridicule. 

Like it or not Ms. Walters, Christmas is by and large a Christian holiday, observed and recognized by both civil holiday as well as a major component of the US population (includes citizen, permanent alien resident, and illegal immigrant as well). 

If Mr/Mrs Bush had elected to blanderize their greeting, I am sure MS. Walters would have complained about how non sectarian it was, &quot;was Mr. Bush afraid to vocalize his traditional religious feeling of good will and thankfulness?&#039; would have been the question she raised. She took the time to trash (&quot;bland&quot;) the artwork of the cover of the card (more needless sniping and complaining).  Absolutely, I think Ms. Walters should ask to be removed from the list in future, and perhaps she should WORK on Tuesday, if expressions of religious /spiritual good wishes at the time of Christmas holiday troubles her so much.  I am sure her artistic comments bring warmth and appreciation to the artist behind that picture of the White House.  Gotta wonder if same card/same art/same message but signed by Mr. Clinton would be treated same way by Ms. Walters?

On behalf of many of my american citizens (and residents) and retired servicemen, I would gladly accept a CHRISTMAS CARD from the President and First Lady, and would under no circumstances feel a need to gripe about the spiritual content nor the choice of cover art.  And if in future we elect a Baptist or a Mormon or a Muslim president, and they were to include my family in mailing list for a similarly spiritual/religious greeting card, I would WELCOME that too... 


I would be delighted to see an apology from the Network for her poor behavior..but then again, there are only so many christmas miracles that can happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what complete and utter rubbish.  She should be feeling honored to be on the White House/Presidential card list. Why do I have the feeling that NO MATTER WHAT Mr.&amp; Mrs. Bush did with the card for BABA she would have taken it as a chance to snipe and ridicule. </p>
<p>Like it or not Ms. Walters, Christmas is by and large a Christian holiday, observed and recognized by both civil holiday as well as a major component of the US population (includes citizen, permanent alien resident, and illegal immigrant as well). </p>
<p>If Mr/Mrs Bush had elected to blanderize their greeting, I am sure MS. Walters would have complained about how non sectarian it was, &#8220;was Mr. Bush afraid to vocalize his traditional religious feeling of good will and thankfulness?&#8217; would have been the question she raised. She took the time to trash (&#8220;bland&#8221;) the artwork of the cover of the card (more needless sniping and complaining).  Absolutely, I think Ms. Walters should ask to be removed from the list in future, and perhaps she should WORK on Tuesday, if expressions of religious /spiritual good wishes at the time of Christmas holiday troubles her so much.  I am sure her artistic comments bring warmth and appreciation to the artist behind that picture of the White House.  Gotta wonder if same card/same art/same message but signed by Mr. Clinton would be treated same way by Ms. Walters?</p>
<p>On behalf of many of my american citizens (and residents) and retired servicemen, I would gladly accept a CHRISTMAS CARD from the President and First Lady, and would under no circumstances feel a need to gripe about the spiritual content nor the choice of cover art.  And if in future we elect a Baptist or a Mormon or a Muslim president, and they were to include my family in mailing list for a similarly spiritual/religious greeting card, I would WELCOME that too&#8230; </p>
<p>I would be delighted to see an apology from the Network for her poor behavior..but then again, there are only so many christmas miracles that can happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LTCPMax</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/12/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/comment-page-1/#comment-115670</link>
		<dc:creator>LTCPMax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/12/22/the-view-on-the-white-house-christmas-card-video/#comment-115670</guid>
		<description>what complete and utter rubbish.  She should be feeling honored to be on the White House/Presidential card list. Why do I have the feeling that NO MATTER WHAT Mr.&amp; Mrs. Bush did with the card for BABA she would have taken it as a chance to snipe and ridicule. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like it or not Ms. Walters, Christmas is by and large a Christian holiday, observed and recognized by both civil holiday as well as a major component of the US population (includes citizen, permanent alien resident, and illegal immigrant as well). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Mr/Mrs Bush had elected to blanderize their greeting, I am sure MS. Walters would have complained about how non sectarian it was, &quot;was Mr. Bush afraid to vocalize his traditional religious feeling of good will and thankfulness?&#039; would have been the question she raised. She took the time to trash (&quot;bland&quot;) the artwork of the cover of the card (more needless sniping and complaining).  Absolutely, I think Ms. Walters should ask to be removed from the list in future, and perhaps she should WORK on Tuesday, if expressions of religious /spiritual good wishes at the time of Christmas holiday troubles her so much.  I am sure her artistic comments bring warmth and appreciation to the artist behind that picture of the White House.  Gotta wonder if same card/same art/same message but signed by Mr. Clinton would be treated same way by Ms. Walters?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On behalf of many of my american citizens (and residents) and retired servicemen, I would gladly accept a CHRISTMAS CARD from the President and First Lady, and would under no circumstances feel a need to gripe about the spiritual content nor the choice of cover art.  And if in future we elect a Baptist or a Mormon or a Muslim president, and they were to include my family in mailing list for a similarly spiritual/religious greeting card, I would WELCOME that too... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would be delighted to see an apology from the Network for her poor behavior..but then again, there are only so many christmas miracles that can happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what complete and utter rubbish.  She should be feeling honored to be on the White House/Presidential card list. Why do I have the feeling that NO MATTER WHAT Mr.&amp; Mrs. Bush did with the card for BABA she would have taken it as a chance to snipe and ridicule. </p>
<p>Like it or not Ms. Walters, Christmas is by and large a Christian holiday, observed and recognized by both civil holiday as well as a major component of the US population (includes citizen, permanent alien resident, and illegal immigrant as well). </p>
<p>If Mr/Mrs Bush had elected to blanderize their greeting, I am sure MS. Walters would have complained about how non sectarian it was, &#8220;was Mr. Bush afraid to vocalize his traditional religious feeling of good will and thankfulness?&#39; would have been the question she raised. She took the time to trash (&#8220;bland&#8221;) the artwork of the cover of the card (more needless sniping and complaining).  Absolutely, I think Ms. Walters should ask to be removed from the list in future, and perhaps she should WORK on Tuesday, if expressions of religious /spiritual good wishes at the time of Christmas holiday troubles her so much.  I am sure her artistic comments bring warmth and appreciation to the artist behind that picture of the White House.  Gotta wonder if same card/same art/same message but signed by Mr. Clinton would be treated same way by Ms. Walters?</p>
<p>On behalf of many of my american citizens (and residents) and retired servicemen, I would gladly accept a CHRISTMAS CARD from the President and First Lady, and would under no circumstances feel a need to gripe about the spiritual content nor the choice of cover art.  And if in future we elect a Baptist or a Mormon or a Muslim president, and they were to include my family in mailing list for a similarly spiritual/religious greeting card, I would WELCOME that too&#8230; </p>
<p>I would be delighted to see an apology from the Network for her poor behavior..but then again, there are only so many christmas miracles that can happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

