The gentleman calls me "hate-filled" because, by definition, anyone who isn't indiscriminate must have come to his position through "hate." That is, just as I said in my talk, rational though is considered a "hate crime" by the left.

Thank you MsUnderestimated, for your service.

Evan

He stated that liberals view anyone with a notion of right and wrong as having descriminated against something no matter how vile it is, to come to that conclusion. In your first post you called Mr. Sayet a "hate filled nut". He said nothing racist or hate filled in his speech, all he did was put forth rational arguments in a civilized manner and you automaticlly call him "hate filled" because of his views on morality.

Really, how so? This man is nothing more than a moron.

Orion, you just proved Mr. Sayet's point.

What, Jay... you missed his name?

Evan Sayet

Check your testosterone and repost again. Your comment is a non-answer and offers no real contests for evidence.

Refute it if you can.

This guy -- whose name you haven't posted -- has offered neither fact nor evidence. His "narrative" hinges on anecdote and hyperbole. I presume you call it a narrative because even you recognize that it's not an argument.

Does any man who considers Supertramp indicative of liberal social policy warrant debate?

Hey!
I just wanted to invite you to join up with what promises to be the biggest rally in American history!
It's Operation America Rising! For more information, visit their blog at www.operationamericarising.com and to join the blogroll just send me an email at admin@anewtone.com

Thanks!

What a great talk. I love his unpretentious and totally rational outlook. He makes the elitest leftists look like fools.

All I can say is; who is this loon? I can 'debate sincerely' only those who are not just hate filled nuts. Man, if this is one of the role models for the right, we're in trouble. You're a sick puppy.

All I can say is WOW!
HOME RUN! TOUCHDOWN! CHECKMATE!