<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Point to Ponder About Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/</link>
	<description>Reality Bytes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Icerigger</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-26338</link>
		<dc:creator>Icerigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-26338</guid>
		<description>They can keep Churchill. What we need is a Charles Martel or Vlad DrÄƒculea.

What is ironic is the fact the the Dhimmicrats actually think Bush is a greater threat than Muhammad&#039;s Islam. 

What part of Koranic mandated world domination, enslavement, conversion do you lefties like the most?

Maybe you love the sexual mutilation of little girls, stoning of women, wife beating, beheadings. Feel free to tell us how Bush is a bigger threat than Muhammad&#039;s murderous desert cult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can keep Churchill. What we need is a Charles Martel or Vlad DrÄƒculea.</p>
<p>What is ironic is the fact the the Dhimmicrats actually think Bush is a greater threat than Muhammad&#8217;s Islam. </p>
<p>What part of Koranic mandated world domination, enslavement, conversion do you lefties like the most?</p>
<p>Maybe you love the sexual mutilation of little girls, stoning of women, wife beating, beheadings. Feel free to tell us how Bush is a bigger threat than Muhammad&#8217;s murderous desert cult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icerigger</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-113901</link>
		<dc:creator>Icerigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-113901</guid>
		<description>They can keep Churchill. What we need is a Charles Martel or Vlad DrÄƒculea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is ironic is the fact the the Dhimmicrats actually think Bush is a greater threat than Muhammad&#039;s Islam. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What part of Koranic mandated world domination, enslavement, conversion do you lefties like the most?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe you love the sexual mutilation of little girls, stoning of women, wife beating, beheadings. Feel free to tell us how Bush is a bigger threat than Muhammad&#039;s murderous desert cult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can keep Churchill. What we need is a Charles Martel or Vlad DrÄƒculea.</p>
<p>What is ironic is the fact the the Dhimmicrats actually think Bush is a greater threat than Muhammad&#39;s Islam. </p>
<p>What part of Koranic mandated world domination, enslavement, conversion do you lefties like the most?</p>
<p>Maybe you love the sexual mutilation of little girls, stoning of women, wife beating, beheadings. Feel free to tell us how Bush is a bigger threat than Muhammad&#39;s murderous desert cult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokey</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-26310</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-26310</guid>
		<description>AJ - I am assuming from your comment that you have read 1984, which does show that at some point you possessed the intelligence to understand it and remember it.  Now, I pose a few questions for you.

One - leaving aside the FACT that Clinton (the left&#039;s night in sticky armor) awarded AT LEAST one no-bid contract to Haliburton, why is it that we are expected to wait until we are attacked to respond?  Is there some rule that requires us to have THOUSANDS OF DEAD BODIES to &quot;justify&quot; going to war?  I hope not, as I prefer a pro-active war where we are not merely responding to an attack.

Second, have you read the entire book?  Do you not know that it was not the same type of person as today&#039;s conservative that created Oceana?  In fact, the inner party are more like liberals, in that they want to control your thoughts, hate religion, and do not follow even the most simple of their own rules.  Much like Animal Farm, &quot;All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others&quot;.

Last - Do you HONESTLY believe that the dems will &quot;get us out of Iraq&quot;?  If so, you might want to take another class or 20 in U.S. Government.  The President is the ONLY PERSON who can order a withdrawl, no matter what bills have been passed.  By attaching a RETREAT timeframe (not to mention plenty of pork) to a funding bill, the dems are shooting their own feet, as there are plenty of people who will remind the entire country of this when 2008 rolls around.

So, no matter how much they try to claim they are &quot;for the troops, just not the war&quot;, I WILL be there to ask them why they delayed DESPERATELY needed funding for only political reasons.

Now, any other cute references to books you feel make you smart, AJ?  Trust me son, I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve read at least 25 times the number of books as you, and that number will only continue to grow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ &#8211; I am assuming from your comment that you have read 1984, which does show that at some point you possessed the intelligence to understand it and remember it.  Now, I pose a few questions for you.</p>
<p>One &#8211; leaving aside the FACT that Clinton (the left&#8217;s night in sticky armor) awarded AT LEAST one no-bid contract to Haliburton, why is it that we are expected to wait until we are attacked to respond?  Is there some rule that requires us to have THOUSANDS OF DEAD BODIES to &#8220;justify&#8221; going to war?  I hope not, as I prefer a pro-active war where we are not merely responding to an attack.</p>
<p>Second, have you read the entire book?  Do you not know that it was not the same type of person as today&#8217;s conservative that created Oceana?  In fact, the inner party are more like liberals, in that they want to control your thoughts, hate religion, and do not follow even the most simple of their own rules.  Much like Animal Farm, &#8220;All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others&#8221;.</p>
<p>Last &#8211; Do you HONESTLY believe that the dems will &#8220;get us out of Iraq&#8221;?  If so, you might want to take another class or 20 in U.S. Government.  The President is the ONLY PERSON who can order a withdrawl, no matter what bills have been passed.  By attaching a RETREAT timeframe (not to mention plenty of pork) to a funding bill, the dems are shooting their own feet, as there are plenty of people who will remind the entire country of this when 2008 rolls around.</p>
<p>So, no matter how much they try to claim they are &#8220;for the troops, just not the war&#8221;, I WILL be there to ask them why they delayed DESPERATELY needed funding for only political reasons.</p>
<p>Now, any other cute references to books you feel make you smart, AJ?  Trust me son, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve read at least 25 times the number of books as you, and that number will only continue to grow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokey</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-113902</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-113902</guid>
		<description>AJ - I am assuming from your comment that you have read 1984, which does show that at some point you possessed the intelligence to understand it and remember it.  Now, I pose a few questions for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One - leaving aside the FACT that Clinton (the left&#039;s night in sticky armor) awarded AT LEAST one no-bid contract to Haliburton, why is it that we are expected to wait until we are attacked to respond?  Is there some rule that requires us to have THOUSANDS OF DEAD BODIES to &quot;justify&quot; going to war?  I hope not, as I prefer a pro-active war where we are not merely responding to an attack.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, have you read the entire book?  Do you not know that it was not the same type of person as today&#039;s conservative that created Oceana?  In fact, the inner party are more like liberals, in that they want to control your thoughts, hate religion, and do not follow even the most simple of their own rules.  Much like Animal Farm, &quot;All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last - Do you HONESTLY believe that the dems will &quot;get us out of Iraq&quot;?  If so, you might want to take another class or 20 in U.S. Government.  The President is the ONLY PERSON who can order a withdrawl, no matter what bills have been passed.  By attaching a RETREAT timeframe (not to mention plenty of pork) to a funding bill, the dems are shooting their own feet, as there are plenty of people who will remind the entire country of this when 2008 rolls around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, no matter how much they try to claim they are &quot;for the troops, just not the war&quot;, I WILL be there to ask them why they delayed DESPERATELY needed funding for only political reasons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, any other cute references to books you feel make you smart, AJ?  Trust me son, I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve read at least 25 times the number of books as you, and that number will only continue to grow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ &#8211; I am assuming from your comment that you have read 1984, which does show that at some point you possessed the intelligence to understand it and remember it.  Now, I pose a few questions for you.</p>
<p>One &#8211; leaving aside the FACT that Clinton (the left&#39;s night in sticky armor) awarded AT LEAST one no-bid contract to Haliburton, why is it that we are expected to wait until we are attacked to respond?  Is there some rule that requires us to have THOUSANDS OF DEAD BODIES to &#8220;justify&#8221; going to war?  I hope not, as I prefer a pro-active war where we are not merely responding to an attack.</p>
<p>Second, have you read the entire book?  Do you not know that it was not the same type of person as today&#39;s conservative that created Oceana?  In fact, the inner party are more like liberals, in that they want to control your thoughts, hate religion, and do not follow even the most simple of their own rules.  Much like Animal Farm, &#8220;All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others&#8221;.</p>
<p>Last &#8211; Do you HONESTLY believe that the dems will &#8220;get us out of Iraq&#8221;?  If so, you might want to take another class or 20 in U.S. Government.  The President is the ONLY PERSON who can order a withdrawl, no matter what bills have been passed.  By attaching a RETREAT timeframe (not to mention plenty of pork) to a funding bill, the dems are shooting their own feet, as there are plenty of people who will remind the entire country of this when 2008 rolls around.</p>
<p>So, no matter how much they try to claim they are &#8220;for the troops, just not the war&#8221;, I WILL be there to ask them why they delayed DESPERATELY needed funding for only political reasons.</p>
<p>Now, any other cute references to books you feel make you smart, AJ?  Trust me son, I&#39;m sure I&#39;ve read at least 25 times the number of books as you, and that number will only continue to grow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orion</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-25881</link>
		<dc:creator>orion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-25881</guid>
		<description>Ms: &quot;Saddam killed that number of people over a 35-year reign of terror, but somehow the American government is more evil than Saddam Hussein and was able to do it in less than 1/5 the time, without chemical weapons! Imagine.&quot;


Ah, lest you forget...WE GAVE HIM THE WEAPS AND CHEMS TO KILL HIS OWN PEOPLE!


And Bush 41 helped:
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/49864/

Jesus, you guys lie your way though anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms: &#8220;Saddam killed that number of people over a 35-year reign of terror, but somehow the American government is more evil than Saddam Hussein and was able to do it in less than 1/5 the time, without chemical weapons! Imagine.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, lest you forget&#8230;WE GAVE HIM THE WEAPS AND CHEMS TO KILL HIS OWN PEOPLE!</p>
<p>And Bush 41 helped:<br />
<a href="http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/49864/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/49864/</a></p>
<p>Jesus, you guys lie your way though anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonnabend</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-25872</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonnabend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-25872</guid>
		<description>Incoherent gibberish screamed at 6200 kph....and they wonder why we don&#039;t take them seriously.

LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incoherent gibberish screamed at 6200 kph&#8230;.and they wonder why we don&#8217;t take them seriously.</p>
<p>LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orion</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-113903</link>
		<dc:creator>orion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-113903</guid>
		<description>Ms: &quot;Saddam killed that number of people over a 35-year reign of terror, but somehow the American government is more evil than Saddam Hussein and was able to do it in less than 1/5 the time, without chemical weapons! Imagine.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ah, lest you forget...WE GAVE HIM THE WEAPS AND CHEMS TO KILL HIS OWN PEOPLE!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Bush 41 helped:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/49864/&quot;&gt;http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/49864/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jesus, you guys lie your way though anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms: &#8220;Saddam killed that number of people over a 35-year reign of terror, but somehow the American government is more evil than Saddam Hussein and was able to do it in less than 1/5 the time, without chemical weapons! Imagine.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, lest you forget&#8230;WE GAVE HIM THE WEAPS AND CHEMS TO KILL HIS OWN PEOPLE!</p>
<p>And Bush 41 helped:<br /><a href="http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/49864/">http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/49864/</a></p>
<p>Jesus, you guys lie your way though anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LTCPMax</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-25858</link>
		<dc:creator>LTCPMax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-25858</guid>
		<description>I dated a girl in college named Meriam Webster... HOW did you know that Ms.U?  Did you get that from the black helicopter world government UN secret date files?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dated a girl in college named Meriam Webster&#8230; HOW did you know that Ms.U?  Did you get that from the black helicopter world government UN secret date files?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonnabend</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-113904</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonnabend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-113904</guid>
		<description>Incoherent gibberish screamed at 6200 kph....and they wonder why we don&#039;t take them seriously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incoherent gibberish screamed at 6200 kph&#8230;.and they wonder why we don&#39;t take them seriously.</p>
<p>LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsUnderestimated</title>
		<link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2007/03/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-25853</link>
		<dc:creator>MsUnderestimated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msunderestimated.com/2007/03/29/a-point-to-ponder-about-iran/#comment-25853</guid>
		<description>Heh. Cao, you used about three or four words the truther won&#039;t understand. I love it. Merriam-Webster anybody? 

Ms.U</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. Cao, you used about three or four words the truther won&#8217;t understand. I love it. Merriam-Webster anybody? </p>
<p>Ms.U</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
