“Why should we put a plan out? Our plan is to stop him. He must be stopped.” ~ Nancy Pelosi, Referring to George W. Bush on FOX News, March 17, 2005

John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), who has been itching to impeach Bush and Cheney for years, will now become chairman of the Judiciary Committee. He is the author of HR 635, which will jumpstart impeachment investigation and most certainly pass the bill in his committee. So the question isn’t if the issue will come up, but if Pelosi will push to see it through. Only time will tell.

“Why should we put a plan out? Our plan is to stop him. He must be stopped.” ~ Nancy Pelosi, Referring to George W. Bush on FOX News, March 17, 2005

John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI), who has been itching to impeach Bush and Cheney for years, will now become chairman of the Judiciary Committee. He is the author of HR 635, which will jumpstart impeachment investigation and most certainly pass the bill in his committee. So the question isn't if the issue will come up, but if Pelosi will push to see it through. Only time will tell.

Ranting and whining response Orion, not really too insightful. Wonder how often you go out public speaking and never made a verbal miscue? And your citations seem less than unbiased sources, just hand picked to back your retorts, obviously.

MacBeach makes good points, but Orion will of course ignore. And no doubt now that we have a crop of new zero seniority DEMOCRAT legislators elected…all prior congressional misfires, pork spending, lack of real progress…all that is over now I am sure.

LTCPMax

A tip o’ the hat to Ms. Underestimated for this although she admits she is unable to find (and thereby give) proper credit for the source:

By now you’ve all seen the Democrats’ campaign slogan: “A New Direction For America — Vote DEMOCRATIC…

Ranting and whining response Orion, not really too insightful. Wonder how often you go out public speaking and never made a verbal miscue? And your citations seem less than unbiased sources, just hand picked to back your retorts, obviously.

MacBeach makes good points, but Orion will of course ignore. And no doubt now that we have a crop of new zero seniority DEMOCRAT legislators elected…all prior congressional misfires, pork spending, lack of real progress…all that is over now I am sure.

LTCPMax

A tip o' the hat to Ms. Underestimated for this although she admits she is unable to find (and thereby give) proper credit for the source:

By now you’ve all seen the Democrats’ campaign slogan: “A New Direction For America — Vote DEMOCRATIC…

Let’s just take item 10. I am a tech person, and I know a lot of other tech people. We all do not agree on the issue of “Net Neutrality”. The Senator in question constructed a sloppy metaphor to describe the issue. Game set and match as far as you guys are concerned. Did you know that a number of high-profile tech people who originally supported Net Neutrality are having second thoughts about it? But you’re not interested in talking about the issue any more. The bad analogy ended the discussion as far as you are concerned. And you think WE look dumb?

Again, there might be a few items in the 100, or even in your selection that a Republican like myself would agree to. But do you know anyone who would sign on to all 100? If so, they/you are a member of the radical left, and if all or even most of those items went your way the electorate would revolt. You may not be old enough to remember, but there was PLENTY of corruption when the Dems controlled government during the span from 1952 to 2000. The intervening years have been tame by comparison. Maybe as a reminder to the youth who have been brainwashed by the mainstream media (not to mention the older people who have MTV attention spans) we need to let the Dems take charge every decade or two. I have high hope that they will be squeaky clean and do only sensible things. But the experience of 50 years tells me otherwise. The next two years will be interesting.

PS: I have pictures of Bill Clinton holding the mouse on the Presidential laptop upside down, and another of his daughter trying to help him get started. And it was near the end of his administration when the majority of Americans were already computer literate. Should we have dismissed any technology opinion he had just because he was (and still is as far as I know) a computer dunce? Sdee how petty you people sound?

Let's just take item 10. I am a tech person, and I know a lot of other tech people. We all do not agree on the issue of “Net Neutrality”. The Senator in question constructed a sloppy metaphor to describe the issue. Game set and match as far as you guys are concerned. Did you know that a number of high-profile tech people who originally supported Net Neutrality are having second thoughts about it? But you're not interested in talking about the issue any more. The bad analogy ended the discussion as far as you are concerned. And you think WE look dumb?

Again, there might be a few items in the 100, or even in your selection that a Republican like myself would agree to. But do you know anyone who would sign on to all 100? If so, they/you are a member of the radical left, and if all or even most of those items went your way the electorate would revolt. You may not be old enough to remember, but there was PLENTY of corruption when the Dems controlled government during the span from 1952 to 2000. The intervening years have been tame by comparison. Maybe as a reminder to the youth who have been brainwashed by the mainstream media (not to mention the older people who have MTV attention spans) we need to let the Dems take charge every decade or two. I have high hope that they will be squeaky clean and do only sensible things. But the experience of 50 years tells me otherwise. The next two years will be interesting.

PS: I have pictures of Bill Clinton holding the mouse on the Presidential laptop upside down, and another of his daughter trying to help him get started. And it was near the end of his administration when the majority of Americans were already computer literate. Should we have dismissed any technology opinion he had just because he was (and still is as far as I know) a computer dunce? Sdee how petty you people sound?