But if you want to bring up American war history, I’m game. History shows us fighting several different types of enemies and ideaologies, in several different ways.

The best example to bring up is the war for independence from the British Crown – were the American revolutionary fighters terrorists? Under your definition, are we to say that movies like “The Patriot” are “pro-terrorist” because much of the fighting style against the British was unorthodox, guerilla style and fighting against the army of a nation that claimed soveriegnty over the land?

History also shows us fighting against opposite ends of the idealogical spectrum. Take, for example, the right-wing facism known as “nazism” durring WW2 (which is close to what the England of the future had become in “V for Vendetta”). Or the left-wing oppression known as “communism” durring the Cold War.

The point is, for you to label a futuristic movie as “anti-American, pro-terrorist” because of the subject matter and idealology they chose to portray is downright ridiculous. Especially given that in “American war history” we’ve successfully fought against several different idealolgies for our freedom, including one that is closely aligned with what is portrayed in the movie.

Rag on the movie all you want about the timing, showing an act, that in modern times, could be construed as terrorism…or playing a two-second clip of real news footage from Iraq; but given the situation portayed in the future in this movie, are you saying you wouldn’t cheer the same act if the ideology portrayed wasn’t extreme right-wing, but instead extreme left-wing?

But if you want to bring up American war history, I'm game. History shows us fighting several different types of enemies and ideaologies, in several different ways.

The best example to bring up is the war for independence from the British Crown – were the American revolutionary fighters terrorists? Under your definition, are we to say that movies like “The Patriot” are “pro-terrorist” because much of the fighting style against the British was unorthodox, guerilla style and fighting against the army of a nation that claimed soveriegnty over the land?

History also shows us fighting against opposite ends of the idealogical spectrum. Take, for example, the right-wing facism known as “nazism” durring WW2 (which is close to what the England of the future had become in “V for Vendetta”). Or the left-wing oppression known as “communism” durring the Cold War.

The point is, for you to label a futuristic movie as “anti-American, pro-terrorist” because of the subject matter and idealology they chose to portray is downright ridiculous. Especially given that in “American war history” we've successfully fought against several different idealolgies for our freedom, including one that is closely aligned with what is portrayed in the movie.

Rag on the movie all you want about the timing, showing an act, that in modern times, could be construed as terrorism…or playing a two-second clip of real news footage from Iraq; but given the situation portayed in the future in this movie, are you saying you wouldn't cheer the same act if the ideology portrayed wasn't extreme right-wing, but instead extreme left-wing?

Would that movie be “pro-terrorist?”

Would that movie be “pro-terrorist?”