Bush Made the World Hate the U.S.A. (VIDEO)

February 25, 2006 Are You Kidding Me?, Bush-Bashing, Media Bias, Telling It Like it Is, Video View Comments

USvsIslamPropaganda.jpg

Ah, the ever-brilliant Neal Gabler. Today on Fox News Watch, one of the topics was the media propaganda war, and who was winning – and why?

The segment began with a piece from Rumsfeld’s speech to the Council on Foreign Relations from Feb. 17th about that very subject, on whether or not we were winning that media war.

Neal: Pointing out a contradiction he sees “…one the one hand, he seems to be promoting the idea of American propaganda; that we ought to go out there and propagandize (Cal makes a face, seen below) just the way that Al Qaeda is doing. And frankly, you know, this Administration doesn’t have that much credibility when it comes to putting anything out there, much less propaganda.”

CalsScoweltoNeal.jpg

The discussion continued…

Cal: “It’s not just the Al Qaeda types with their almost universal message and their censorship of other information. It’s also Western press. I watch a lot of the BBC, especially when I’m in the U.K. I don’t even recognize my own country. They almost always take the side of not only the political left, but the Palestinians in the Middle East – the Arab side – they go out of their way not to give the Israeli side. And so I think it’s more than just the Arab world. I think there’s a lot of media in Europe, in the U.K., that is hostile to all things American…”

Neal: (putting arm around Cal, as seen below) “Aw, are we beating up on George Bush, Cal?”

NealHandaroundCal.jpg

Cal: “No, I didn’t say just Bush – the United States period, regardless of the Administration!”

Jane opines about how the United States is held to a higher standard, and that’s one of the reasons why we can’t top their propaganda levels. Then she explains further:

Jane: “Our policies are being used against us. The propagandists in the Muslim world are using the fact that we were not greeted with dates and flowers, but we’re seen as an occupying force. They’re using that against us, and they are cannier. I mean, we don’t put beheadings on the air…”

They then began to debate the disparity between the propaganda from the terrorists versus pro-Western media.

Jim: “I don’t think we lack for people spending money on communications and propaganda and things like that. I think what we’re up against is, and this is a little bit where Cal’s coming in: a) the Western media on the whole are kind of anti-American. And second of all, let’s face it; if the battle is over images and ideas, all the magazines of Bush shaking hands with some little kid and patting him on the head and stuff like that are kind of dwarfed by… in terms of the impact of blowing up that Mosque. It’s what the Italian anarchists call the “propaganda of the deed.” Blowing up that Mosque in Samarra is front-page news before and after.

“If you want to foment trouble in Iraq, they’ve found a way to do it. And whether it was the Iranians, or Al Qaeda, or just some free-lancer in Iraq, who knows? But that’s why we’re in so much trouble. We can win the military war, we’ve proven that, but the media war, with all its components, is kind of beyond that…”

Jane then laments about the near-civil-war sectarian violence being more than just a symbol, then Cal reminds us that a lot of “facts” on the ground are being attributed to being created by the enemies of the United States.

Cal: “If the elections had been allowed to work without the invaders coming in from other countries…they’re not really portrayed as invaders. They’re coming from other nations. Their goal is to create chaos in order to make the United States look back and stay longer.”

The discussion begins to talk about our need for more unity in the Western world….then Jim points out that the UAE Arabs are a lot different than the Al Qaeda Arabs. (getting the message out in the Arab world vs. the Western world)

Neal: “Well, Democracy is a mess! But let me say that perception…let me pick up on something Jane was saying. Perception is not just a function of media coverage; media coverage is also a function of perception. Let’s face it – five years ago, we weren’t hated by every single country in the world. The Bush Administration has contributed mightily to the fact, and the war in Iraq, has contributed mightily to the fact that people hate this country now. And, whether we like it or not, that’s a fact! That’s not just the media’s…“

Jim then dares to say something positive about our relations with the UAE, and Neal sarcastically pipes in “Oh, yeah the UAE LOVES us now!”

Okay, besides the smart-ass comments about the Democracy being a mess, and about the UAE, does Neal really believe that NO other country hated us before Bush took office? Let’s see… hmmm.. I seem to recall that Carter was in office when the U.S. hostages were taken by Iranians, Clinton was in office when the atrocities portrayed in the movie Blackhawk Down were permitted (by him, nonetheless), and I don’t believe G.W. was in office when the U.S.S. Cole was attacked. So, I guess AQ Khan, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Ba’athists, etcs., were all truly fans of the U.S.A. until Bush took office. Yeah… that’s sounds about right, doesn’t it?

Watch Neal implode here

Also as Expose the Left, Stop the ACLU, Jo’s Cafe, and Gribbit’s Word.

Choose Options to Share This Post
[Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [MySpace] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Email] More »

State of the Black Union (VIDEO)

February 24, 2006 Bush-Bashing, Just Plain Wrong, Video View Comments

Folks, this illustrious event will be held in Houston, TX this weekend, and broadcast on TV Saturday. For reasons other than it will be a sheer pleasure to watch it, I will be recording it to report back here (besides, I don’t have a root canal scheduled for that day either, unfortunately). We got a preview, however, tonight on Hannity & Colmes. Tavis Smiley & Cornell West appeared on the show to talk about this weekend’s upcoming event, the “State of the Black Union,” and proudly advertised it would be televised on C-SPAN all weekend. I’ve listened to this over and over, and I still can’t make much sense of what Tavis or Cornell are talking about!?!?

SeanSmileyCornell2.jpg

Right out of the box, Alan warns that Sean will be along to rattle on about Harry Belafonte, blah, blah, and blah…. But finally after Sean does get to speak, Tavis immediately gets into the spirit of things. He comments that “black folk (sic) resent things… they resent being taken for granted by the Democrats, they resent being ignored by the Republicans, they resent having an Administration that pushes an agenda and often times is unanswerable to their agenda…”

All this despite Sean just having pointed out that President Bush has appointed MORE African-Americans and other minorities to positions of power in his Administration than any other president in history! If any of you can follow Tavis’ or Cornell’s rapid-fire dialogue, you are more than welcome to transcribe it for me. It’s more of the typical democrat-speak: “speak so passionately that your audience doesn’t care whether there’s any substance to what you say or not; they just believe in you” – OR “speak so quickly, AND feverishly, that your empassioned audience not only doen’t care what you say, but they still agree with you anyway, even though they can’t understand it.”

This is so much demagoguery that I can’t make sense of any of it.

Sean asks why the most notable African-Americans in the Bush Administration are never present for these events, and neither Tavis nor Cornell can even explain it. Why aren’t people like Colin Powell, Condi Rice, Clarence Thomas, invited Sean asked? Well, to their credit, they do claim that they may have been “invited,” but didn’t show up…. ??? Tavis, you go on with your “courage of conviction” attitude… just see how far you get with it.

StateofBlackUnion.jpg

And here’s another teaser….Tavis says he has a “major announcement” to make to both the Republican and the Democratic party this Saturday at this “State of the Black Union Symposium.” He wouldn’t say what that major announcement was (although I’m waiting on pins and needles), but it will probably be fun to watch anyway. Wonder if they’ll have Malik Zulu Shabazz as a guest speaker? (If you’ve never seen this Moonbat, tou can watch that unhinged video at MichelleMalkin.com, for another piece of enlightened entertainment.)

P.S. Michelle has the WHOLE story on this sect of lunacy we can expect from the “unhinged,” as she so rightly calls them. And the pre-eminent Expose the Left has the story, as well as Jo’s Cafe, and Right on the Right.

Watch Video Here

Choose Options to Share This Post
[Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [MySpace] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Email] More »

ACLU & CAIR Promoting Islam While Suppressing Christians & Jews

February 23, 2006 Stop The ACLU BlogBurst View Comments

Originally Appeared on Gribbit’s Word on 28 August 2005

For a year now, Stop The ACLU has been bringing information to you about the evil ways of the ACLU. We’ve been telling you about their war on religion, the Boy Scouts, Christmas, religious icons in public, the 10 Commandments, children, and the United States. But are you listening?

Judging by the comments that we receive, I’d say the only people listening are our own members and those who are poised to argue the ACLU cause. But we must have some readers who are in shock or out-right disbelief that any organization called “American” Civil Liberties Union would be fighting for causes contrary to the best interests of this nation. But they are.

Their latest alliance is with CAIR (Council on American – Islamic Relations). Op/Ed writer Sher Zieve had this to say in The American Daily.

ACLU Alliance with CAIR?
By Sher Zieve (08/26/05)

For those who are still not familiar with the group CAIR – the Council on American – Islamic Relations – I’ll provide some background information. Founded in 1994, CAIR is headquarted in Washington, DC and has thirty-one chapters and regional offices in the United States and Canada. Of note, CAIR was founded by Nihad Awad, Omar Ahwad, Rafiq Jaber and other former members of the Islamic Association of Palestine (IAP). Jaber is also the current spokesman for the Bridgeview Mosque Foundation in Illinois; a mosque tied to the IAP and the Quranic Literacy Institute that were named in the 2004 drive-by murder of David Boim. The IAP and Quranic Literacy Institute were ordered by the court to pay Boim’s family $156MM in restitution; money that had previously been raised in the US (as “charity” donations) by these Islamic organizations. *US donations used to finance terrorist activities and, subsequently, for the results of said terrorist activities – most interesting.

Note: The IAP has often been referred to as the American wing of Hamas – a terrorist group that has vowed to destroy Israel. Of interest, Hamas senior leader Mahmoud al-Zahar said in a recent interview with Arab newspaper Asharq Al Awsat: “We do not and will not recognize a state called Israel. This land is the property of all Muslims in all parts of the world. Let Israel die!” Suffice it to say, this is not an organization that has any desire or any plans for peace.

CAIR currently has enough political and “PC” (political-correctness) clout to cow the US political and business establishment. Even though three of its (now former) members were convicted of federal terrorism charges, CAIR has greatly increased its influence in the US. Of note are CAIR’s intimidation of the publication National Review to stop [its] running advertisements for the books “The Life and Religion of Mohammed” and “The Sword of the Prophet” and the recent firing of talk-show host Michael Graham from ABC-Disney Radio for making anti-Islamo-fascist comments. Is a trend being established, here? Are all Radio talk-show hosts no longer going to be able to speak against Islamic terrorism? Watch out Rush, Praeger and Hannity! You may be next.

Islamic education in the US (are these Wahabee schools?) also appears to be in the process of attempting to take over US private school organizations – at least in Texas. In 2004, the Islamic Education Institute of Texas sought inclusion into TAPPS (Texas Association of Private and Parochial Schools). As reported by the Houston Chronicle, Edd Burleson (Director of TAPPS) had the ‘extreme audacity’ to ask questions of the Islamic educational organization. Quoting the Islamic Quran, which calls upon Muslims to be violent against Christians and Jews, Burleson asked in a letter containing ten questions to the group: “Why do you wish to join an organization whose membership is basically in total disagreement with your religious beliefs?” and “Why do you wish to join an organization whose membership is basically in total disagreement with your religious beliefs?” As if asking these questions weren’t cheeky enough, Burleson went on to ask about the Islamic organization’s position on “the spread of Islam in America” and the objectives of the school “in this regard.” A week later, Burleson sent another letter that included the question “Do you teach your students to ‘Make war on them (Christians and Jews) until idolatry is no more and Allah’s religion reigns supreme’ (Koran 8:37)?” These questions were enough to bring the ACLU flying to Islam’s defense. The ACLU and CAIR demanded an apology from Burleson! It appears that questions directed to Islamic organizations are no longer to be allowed in the USA. However, as we already know, reverse situations are allowed. Christians may be asked any and all questions and are allowed to be brow-beaten unmercifully by both Islam and the ACLU. Christians are not liked nor accepted by Islam. And if we have learned anything at all from its myriad suits against the teaching or even displays of Christianity, neither does the ACLU. Remember the ACLU’s threatened suit against the County of Los Angeles, for merely having a small cross on its County Seal? One has to wonder if the ACLU would have threatened the county if the Islamic crescent had been present. Doubtful. But then, the ACLU is increasingly joining with CAIR on a number of battlefronts and lawsuits. A few of these include the following:

* The ACLU is working with CAIR and Amnesty International (a decidedly in-my-opinion Marxist group) to defend Ghassan Elashi and his brothers who were convicted of terrorism.
* In 2001, the ACLU joined CAIR and other Islamic support groups to challenge the detention of potential terrorists.
* In 2003, the ACLU joined CAIR and other Muslim advocacy groups to challenge portions of the Patriot Act.
* Also, in 2003, the Ohio chapter of the ACLU awarded its yearly “Liberty Flame Award” to the Ohio chapter of CAIR “for contributions to the advancement and protection of civil liberties.”
* In 2004, the ACLU joined CAIR in demanding the FBI make its files public as to [its] surveillance of Chicago Muslim groups and ‘expressed special concern today over the FBI’s targeting of Muslims and Arabs in the Chicago community’. Note: Remember it was two Illinois groups (the IAP and Quranic Literacy Institute) that were convicted of terrorist murder.
* In North Carolina 2005, the ACLU joined forces with CAIR toward including swearing on the Koran (as opposed to the Bible) for Muslims. Note: The push for Shari’a law in Canada has already become a strong force. Will the US be next?

The above cites are only a few examples of the ACLU’s increasing alliance with CAIR; an association that does not appear to have any indications of disbanding. Yet, the ACLU’s affinity towards Christian groups and Christianity as a whole is nonexistent. Although some may wonder at the ACLU’s agenda, I don’t. Its current and past actions speak louder than any possible words. Don’t believe me? Check the Net, yourself, for ACLU-CAIR alliances. The alignments are there for anyone willing to take the time to do so. I, for one, find it exceedingly troubling.

Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieve’s Op/Ed columns are widely carried by multiple Internet Journals and sites and she also writes hard news. Her columns have, also, appeared in The Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Boston Star, Massachusetts Sun, Sacramento Sun, in International news publications and on multiple University websites. Ms. Zieve has been a guest on several radio shows, including The Alan Colmes’ Show, and is currently working on her first political book: “The Liberal’s Guide To Conservatives” http://www.augustagency.com/authors.htm

Zieve firmly believes that if Leftists ran the country (and left to their own inane devices), it would be the end of the United States as a sovereign nation.

NOTE: In Accordance With Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, This Material Is Distributed Without Profit Or Payment To Those Who Have Expressed A Prior Interest In Receiving This Information For Non-Profit Research And Educational Purposes Only.

As large of a threat as radical Islam as practiced by al-Qaeda is to the security of the United States, the ACLU is a larger threat. Why do I say that? Because the ACLU is doing to America what the Soviet Union couldn’t. They are making good on the promise that Kruschev made at the UN when he proclaimed that the Soviet Union would bury us. They have been doing it slowly and silently over an 85 year period. They do it by opposing everything that is America.

In radical Islam and al Qaeda, the ACLU sees a method by which they can accomplish their goals more quickly. They see the measures being taken to secure the country as a way to further exploit the American public’s fears of losing their freedoms. And this is a misconception that the ACLU is feeding. By creating a reason to fear the loss.

The ACLU has been going around telling America that the Patriot Act is an infringement on the Constitutional right to privacy. No such right exists. The only people that should fear the provisions of the Patriot Act are those wishing to do harm to the nation either knowingly or unknowingly.

If you are involved in a terrorist cell you should fear it. If you are involved in funneling money to a terrorist cell, you should be afraid. If you are involved in donating monies to organizations which funnel funds to terrorists and terrorist cells you should be worried. But if you are doing nothing to harm your country, the Patriot Act isn’t something that you should fear. The ACLU is.

The ACLU would have you believe that designating 2 minutes at the beginning of the school day for school children to pray, meditate, study, read, or sleep is state promotion of religion. But they think nothing of teaching classes on understanding Islam.

The ACLU objects to the presence of the 10 Commandments on the walls of a court house. But yet they call for the Koran to be used in the court house for swearing in Muslim defendants and witnesses.

The ACLU has a problem with displaying a nativity scene in the town square but they see nothing wrong with witches performing ceremonies there.

The ACLU has launched an assault on religion in America. With just a few exceptions. Islam, Wicca, and the Church of Satan are all ok with the ACLU. But Christianity and Judaism are taboo.

This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay or Gribbit. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 150 blogs already on-board.
Choose Options to Share This Post
[Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [MySpace] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Email] More »

A Pedophile’s Best Friend (VIDEO)

February 19, 2006 Crime, Just Plain Wrong, One Way Ticket to Hell, Video View Comments

Bill O’Reilly is still at it. No matter how much he gets bashed for being too “harsh” on these idiot judges and attorneys who defend pedophiles, I have to say I’m DEEPLY thankful that we have such a strong voice about this egregious crime.

Stalking and molesting children has been occurring all too often, and with not much consequence as of late for the offenders. I don’t know if it’s happening more lately because of the Internet, or if it’s just easier to track and catch them now BECAUSE of the Internet. But either way… these deviants must be stopped, and their enablers put in the limelight until they are publicly humiliated by folks like O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, and John Walsh.

ShawnStrawser.jpg

This past week, Bill highlighted the case of a Florida man, 20-year-old Shawn Strawser, who was convicted of luring FOUR 7- to 10-year-old girls to perform oral sex on him!!!!! Strawser was represented by slimeball attorney, Jeffrey Voluck. They went before FL Court Circuit Judge, Marc Gold, and he was given his sentence.

JudgeGivesMolester15mo.jpg

Ready for this?

Fifteen months in jail, 75 months of probation, and lifetime registration as a sex-offender (which Voluck believes is a very stiff punishment).

Defense attorney Voluck talks about mitigating factors? Excuse me? Mitigating factors? I ain’t buyin it, and neither is Bill (but he was way too nice in my opinion).


Bill: … these little girls have to carry that their whole life! Do you take that into consideration, counselor? 

PedophileAttorney.jpg

Voluck: I take it into consideration, Bill. In Florida, we also have depositions in criminal cases. I took the depositions of all four of these little girls. They were all very sweet little girls, and I think that they were remarkable little girls, and I think that they are going to do just fine as they grow up.

Bill: But you don’t know!

Voluck: …and I think…

Bill: …and that’s a trauma!

Voluck: Nothing is certain, it is a trauma, and I don’t downgrade, the… the…uh, you know, what they went through. But you know every individual is different, and in this particular case, the psychiatric testimony indicated that Shawn Strawser is NOT likely to be a sexual predator among, because…

Bill: Were those guys paid? Were those psychiatrists paid, those psychologists paid?

Voluck: Well, the psychologists, of course, are paid for their time.

After the volley about hired guns by the defense, they continued…

Bill: We DO know four little girls had their childhood taken away from them in an awful, awful way by this individual who then only serves 15 months. I don’t think that’s enough, counselor, but I’ll give you that last word.

Voluck: Well, Bill I understand what you’re saying. It’s also 15 months followed by 75 months’ probation, and he’s designated as a sexual predator, which is a very tough criteria to live under. So, it’s not a cake-walk under any….uh…sense of the imagination.

Bill: I think it is. Well, he’d be doing 25-to-life if he did what he did now in FL because of Jessica’s law.

How in the hell does this jackass “know” that these “sweet little girls” (which is how Strawser saw them) will do “okay” after this? They were SEVEN to TEN years old! You tell me, Mr. Strawser and dumbass Judge Gold – how is a 7-year-old girl supposed to get her mind clear of having to put an adult’s penis in her mouth? Huh? You tell me, you pompous, mentally deranged jackass! You have NO RIGHT, NEITHER of you, to give your damn opinion on what these “sweet” little girls will or will NOT get over!

You stupid sonofabitch…you have NO clue what it’s like to be a victim! I DO! Hell, I was 27 years old when it happened to me, am 43 now, and STILL have nightmares about it! What in God’s name gives you the impression that a 7-year-old girl can “get over” something so vile, so sickening, that it makes me want to vomit right at this very moment!?!? Idiotic assholes like yourselves have zero input as far as I’m concerned, as to what it’s like to survive a violent crime. Maybe it’s time you should know for yourselves.

I’m not wishing any immediate ill-will to you, but you MFs do NOT need to be sitting behind the bench or behind the defense table next to the pedophile! Strawser is a sexual deviant who deserves to die for his sins, and the judge and defense attorney are just as complicit! What in God’s name is wrong with Florida?

It’s no wonder we love people like Bill, Sean and John Walsh. I’m just sorry that people like Polly Klaas.jpgMark Klaas and Marc Lunsford JessicaLunsford.jpghad to be drug into this horrible nightmare. Hell has a special place waiting for people like Strawser, and I’m sure a lot of us would love to volunteer to be his travel agent. It’s God’s place to judge these evil people in their final days, but it is our job as decent human beings to arrange that meeting.

Please, God… take care of these people at your earliest convenience… save these young children from their sick, twisted, demented, wicked, evil, wretched ways.

There is a similarly wicked entity waiting for people like this… and the sooner the journey, the better for our children… Demon.jpg

If you can stomach it, watch slimeball Voluck here.

Choose Options to Share This Post
[Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [MySpace] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Email] More »

Juan Makes a Good Idiot Sandwich (VIDEO)

February 18, 2006 Telling It Like it Is, Video View Comments

Jim Angle sat in for Brit Hume on Friday’s “Special Report,” probably because Brit had too many idiots to fend off for his alleged “softball” questions for Vice Pres. Cheney in his exclusive interview. The other BBNs are just jealous… CNN’s Jack Cafferty even referred to the Fox News Channel as the “F-word channel” (see John Gibson’s radio response here).

Does the truth hurt, Jack? You guys are losing in the ratings, and you don’t even know why. It’s right there, glaring in your face and you can’t even see it.

CaffertyJackass.jpg (photo courtesy of Expose the Left)

Heck, even MSNBC’s own poll about who really cared about the story, or thought it was important, showed that only 30% cared about it at all, and 70% couldn’t care less.

Anyway, it was panel-time, and tonight was a fantastic arrangement. It was Fred Barnes at the end of the table, Charles Krauthammer on the right of Jim, and that NPR idiot, Juan Williams, sandwiched in between. I knew he was sunk when the panel line-up was announced. He should have known, too, and taken his crayons and gone home. But, much to my delight, he didn’t – and provided us with a few good laughs. He was nothing more than a play-toy for Fred & Charles, both heavyweights in the politico pundit arena, and Juan is a mere puppet for the Left.

IdiotJuanSandwich.jpg

Here’s how some of it played out:

Jim first asked Charles about the status of the issue, and Charles said the story was over, especially after the public appearance of an apparently-healthy 78-year-old Whittington after being sprayed in the face with shotgun pellets in a hunting accident. Then Juan weighed in…

Juan: “Well, I think the story’s done if you think it’s about Mr. Whittington, and I hope that he’s in good health and recovers fully. But I think this story is mostly about Vice President Cheney, at least here inside Washington.”

That’s right, Juan…. it’s not at all about the victim.. it’s only about Cheney. And of COURSE it’s “mostly” inside Washington! The Washington media elite, of which David Gregory is a part, seem to think the world revolves around them. Americans realize they look like and act like spoiled brat babies, but they continue to provide us with fodder on an almost-daily basis, unaware of the Vaudeville show they’re putting on for the world to see.

Pelosi.jpg
Then Fred reminded us about Nancy Pelosi, and how you’d have thought she was talking about something as serious as the Whitewater investigation! He also pointed out that she was saying this is about Cheney thinking he’s above the law, and appropriately then asks “what law?” Cheney broke no law! Responsible nor accountable, she declared? For what? For not reporting directly to David Gregory?

Even though the local authorities WERE contacted within the hour, the Sheriff of that county said that reporting hunting accidents was not even required by the law there. The only “law” he broke was the one folks like David Gregory think exists – that the Administration is “required” to inform the White House Press Corp. of ALL news first before they tell anybody else. As Sean Hannity says, they got their “widdle feewings hurt!”

Jim lastly asked Charles about the WaPo fashion writer weighing in on Cheney’s choice of a pink tie for the interview with Brit, about what kind of credence that held, and if it was any indication the story was winding down.

CheneyPinkTie.jpg

Charles: “When you’re writing about the guy’s tie, the story is over. That’s a hint, that’s a clue; count on it now and in the future.”

Are you listening, Juan? David? Terry Moran? Helen Thomas? ~crickets~…. didn’t think so.

(All of the links above are courtesy of Expose the Left. Great job, Ian! – an inspiration to all bloggers!)

Watch the “Panel” video here

For a brief take on the WaPo’s article on Cheney’s pink tie, Jim had a bit about it on the Grapevine segment that day. The fashion critic said it was like “Pigtails on a ‘Gangsta Rapper’?” Huh? See the video here.

Choose Options to Share This Post
[Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [MySpace] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Email] More »

The Peanut Gallery In Action (VIDEO)

February 18, 2006 Bush-Bashing, Liberal Bed-Wetters, Media Bias, Video View Comments

Folks, these are a couple of excerpts over the past week of the insanity that comprises what is the White House Press Corps. Is there a Constitutional provision that grants them the rights to act like idiots in those privileged chairs? No… but that doesn’t stop them anyway.

ThomasSowell.jpg
As Thomas Sowell said in his TownHall.com column on Thursday:


The same journalists who used phony documents to attack President Bush’s military service recognize no “right to know” why Senator John Kerry’s honorable discharge is dated long after his service was over and during the Carter administration, when less than honorable discharges were allowed to be upgraded to honorable. 

The “public’s right to know” apparently extends only to such things as will not cause the public to reach conclusions different from those of the liberal media.

My favorite press secretary was Margaret Tutwiler, who treated reporters like misbehaving little boys, which is how they often acted. Nor were the reporters’ antics due solely to personal boorishness.

They had before them the example of Dan Rather and Sam Donaldson, who reached the big time on TV by being snotty to Presidents. At the very least, White House correspondents can get more time on the tube by waxing indignant at what they choose to portray as violations of “the public’s right to know” while the cameras are rolling.

CheneyCriminalOffenseQuestion.jpg

Honest…. during the first round of questioning, these were ACTUAL questions to Scott McClellan about the Veep’s hunting accident! (not all reporter names known… just Gregory’s)


“Are you satisfied with the way this was handled?” 

“Were you aware that they were just going to allow a private citizen to inform a local paper of this?”

“Did the Vice President follow all appropriate safety procedures that are familiar to hunters?” (the illustrious David Gregory)

“Was that his gun, that shotgun?”

“Is it proper for the Vice President to offer his resignation, or has he offered his resignation?”

“Who was doing the providing, and who were they providing it to?”

“Was the Vice President immediately clear that he had accidentally shot his friend, or not?” (again, Mr. Gregory)

“How is it that the word of the shooting, and that the Vice President was involved… could have been confused or delayed?”

“Under TX law, is this kind of accidental shooting a possible criminal offense?”

Scott McClellan deserves a Purple Heart and hazardous duty pay for what (and who) he has to endure! Here are just a couple of examples… And David… Yes, this WAS (and always IS) about you! It’s ALWAYS about you!

AsshatGregory1.jpg

Aaaahhhhhh…. the youngest, brightest stars of the new MSM talking heads. Guess that just means more folks will be switching over to the Fox News Channel.

Hey…. last person to leave the Washington press corps. pre-school… please have the teacher turn out the lights. It will save at least the last dim bulb from burning out before the room is evacuated.

DavidURStuckOnStupid.jpg

I have been thinking for a long time that Scott McClellan should just point at David Gregory, and say “David… you’re stuck on stupid,” but my wish never comes true (although the reality remains).

Peanut Gallery Montage here
…and McClellan V Gregory here

Choose Options to Share This Post
[Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [MySpace] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Email] More »

Search This Site:

Content Tags:

2008 Election ACORN Afghanistan America Barack Barack Obama Bill O'Reilly Comedy Congress Corruption Crime Democrats Economy Elisabeth Hasselbeck Fascism Fox News Fraud Freedom Gitmo Glenn Beck Government Control Government Spending Healthcare Hollywood Humor Hypocrisy Iraq Islam John McCain Joy Behar Military MSNBC Nancy Pelosi Neil Cavuto Obama Patriotism Politics Rush Limbaugh Sarah Palin Socialism Terrorism The View Video War on Terror White House

Premium Blogads

ADVERTISE HERE! Get plenty of site traffic for your product. Inquire within: MsUnderestimated@gmail.com

Proud Member of “The 9/12 Project”


Who’s Here Now?

And My Thanks Go To…

Schtuff






Click here to honor the heroes of United Flight 93

CODE RED – MELT THE PHONES!



CALL THE CAPITOL SWITCHBOARD
877-762-8762 or 202-224-3121

Then call the NRCC's List of Targeted Congressmen
Click the Logo Above for Contact Information!

Welcome To All



The 2008 Weblog Awards

RESOURCES

Trading Stocks
Life Insurance Rates
Free online games
Cell Phones
Luminox Watches

Support This Site

Like my site?



Buy Ms.U Gear Here
Support This Site

My Visitors



Islam Is Peace?

TTLB & Technorati


Recent Comments:

  • vessel sink: marine hero protects the country from smuggler which are destroying the country from crisis.Hard to read. Had something well better....
  • mark: The health care bill received the required 60 votes in the Senate to overcome Republican opposition. Democracy isn't tyranny just because you are...
  • NamelessCynic: Matthew 25:34-45"Then the King will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom pre...
  • lvogt: It's not towing a line to state what is obvious. FNC is broadly dishonest....
  • MsUnderestimated: What do you think of the recent "victimhood" being used by the Dems?...

Popular Content: