Comments on: Durbin the “Turbin” Hypocrite Exposed (VIDEO) http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/01/durbin-the-turban-hypocrite-exposed-video/ Reality Bytes Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:35:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: MsUnderestimated http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/01/durbin-the-turban-hypocrite-exposed-video/comment-page-1/#comment-31 MsUnderestimated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:06:43 +0000 http://www.msunderestimated.com/?p=23#comment-31 No, I don't see how they're different. When Clinton did it, he amended the law AFTER he had violated the 4th Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures! You can't make a crime retroactive. Ms. U No, I don’t see how they’re different. When Clinton did it, he amended the law AFTER he had violated the 4th Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures! You can’t make a crime retroactive.

Ms. U

]]> By: jpe http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/01/durbin-the-turban-hypocrite-exposed-video/comment-page-1/#comment-30 jpe Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:57:07 +0000 http://www.msunderestimated.com/?p=23#comment-30 When Clinton ordered the search of Ames's house, FISA didn't require a warrant; and there was abundant caselaw to support his decision. (also, unlike Bush, he actually got a warrant to wiretap Ames, in order to build the evidence up to probably cause prior to searching the house). Clinton: followed the law. Bush: broke the law. See how they're different? When Clinton ordered the search of Ames’s house, FISA didn’t require a warrant; and there was abundant caselaw to support his decision. (also, unlike Bush, he actually got a warrant to wiretap Ames, in order to build the evidence up to probably cause prior to searching the house).

Clinton: followed the law.

Bush: broke the law.

See how they’re different?

]]>